Deadline: 1 Apr 2015 (annual)
Study in: UK
Course starts September 2015
Study in: UK
Course starts September 2015
Monday, 5 January 2015
List of Africans Scholarships, Grants, and Fellowships for International Students in UK
Africa is one of the top regions in the world that receive a lot of
development aid. Some of these aid are in the form of development
scholarships for African students to pursue education abroad. This is
done to develop the human resource and improve capacity building in the
region. Listed below are top international scholarships
specifically targeted to African students. The United Kingdom expects some 30,000 international students each year in the United Kingdom. A total of 34,160 students from Africa were studying at higher education institutions in the UK in 2012/13.
Sunday, 4 January 2015
Assess the ways in which the stigma of infertility is gendered: Nursing paper
Thesis Topic
"Assess the ways in which the stigma of infertility is gendered.
Use specific examples to illustrate your answer"
This is more of a psychological impact essay most probably in the APA format. The design and research methodology and literature review gathering will be quite a challenge. Such essays are now frequenting the universities and stress is laid on the approach and discovery of topics which were less explored earlier.
Recommended essay service
Friday, 2 January 2015
Thesis writing
Whats wrong with the image above?
Well you don't write a thesis by using literature in its physical form. Of course that was fine some 20 years ago but not now!
Always use electronic forms of literature and open up two word documents for one assignment. In the first doc file write your thesis and in the second one save your references, citations and authors etc which is going to make up your bibliography
Recommended essay writing service
Essay Help
If you need essay help and decide to go for an essay service, don't go for the following
1. Cheap essay writing services
2. Services that offer discounts
3. Services that give you a paper in 12 or 6 hours
Recommended essay service
Writing Essays
Below is a good example of a structured Essay !
A major change that has occurred in the Western family is an increased incidence in divorce. Whereas in the past, divorce was a relatively rare occurrence, in recent times it has become quite commonplace. This change is borne out clearly in census figures. For example thirty years ago in Australia, only one marriage in ten ended in divorce; nowadays the figure is more than one in three (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996: p.45). A consequence of this change has been a substantial increase in the number of single parent families and the attendant problems that this brings (Kilmartin, 1997).
An important issue for sociologists, and indeed for all of society, is why these changes in marital patterns have occurred. In this essay I will seek to critically examine a number of sociological explanations for the 'divorce phenomenon' and also consider the social policy implications that each explanation carries with it. It will be argued that the best explanations are to be found within a broad socio-economic framework.
One type of explanation for rising divorce has focused on changes in laws relating to marriage. For example, Bilton, Bonnett and Jones (1987) argue that increased rates of divorce do not necessarily indicate that families are now more unstable. It is possible, they claim, that there has always been a degree of marital instability. They suggest that changes in the law have been significant, because they have provided unhappily married couples with 'access to a legal solution to pre-existent marital problems' (p.301). Bilton et al. therefore believe that changes in divorce rates can be best explained in terms of changes in the legal system. The problem with this type of explanation however, is that it does not consider why these laws have changed in the first place. It could be argued that reforms to family law, as well as the increased rate of divorce that has accompanied them, are the product of more fundamental changes in society.
Another type of explanation is one that focuses precisely on these broad societal changes. For example, Nicky Hart (cited in Haralambos, 1995) argues that increases in divorce and marital breakdown are the result of economic changes that have affected the family. One example of these changes is the raised material aspirations of families, which Hart suggests has put pressure on both spouses to become wage earners. Women as a result have been forced to become both homemakers and economic providers. According to Hart, the contradiction of these two roles has lead to conflict and this is the main cause of marital breakdown. It would appear that Hart's explanation cannot account for all cases of divorce - for example, marital breakdown is liable to occur in families where only the husband is working. Nevertheless, her approach, which is to relate changes in family relations to broader social forces, would seem to be more probing than one that looks only at legislative change.
The two explanations described above have very different implications for social policy, especially in relation to how the problem of increasing marital instability might be dealt with. Bilton et al. (1995) offer a legal explanation and hence would see the solutions also being determined in this domain. If rises in divorce are thought to be the consequence of liberal divorce laws, the obvious way to stem this rise is to make them less obtainable. This approach, one imagines, would lead to a reduction in divorce statistics; however, it cannot really be held up as a genuine solution to the problems of marital stress and breakdown in society. Indeed it would seem to be a solution directed more at symptoms than addressing fundamental causes. Furthermore, the experience of social workers, working in the area of family welfare suggests that restricting a couple's access to divorce would in some cases serve only to exacerbate existing marital problems (Johnson, 1981). In those cases where violence is involved, the consequences could be tragic. Apart from all this, returning to more restrictive divorce laws seems to be a solution little favoured by Australians. (Harrison, 1990).
Hart (cited in Haralambos, 1995), writing from a Marxist-feminist position, traces marital conflict to changes in the capitalist economic system and their resultant effect on the roles of men and women. It is difficult to know however, how such an analysis might be translated into practical social policies. This is because the Hart program would appear to require in the first place a radical restructuring of the economic system. Whilst this may be desirable for some, it is not achievable in the present political climate. Hart is right however, to suggest that much marital conflict can be linked in some way to the economic circumstances of families. This is borne out in many statistical surveys which show consistently that rates of divorce are higher among socially disadvantaged families (McDonald, 1993). This situation suggests then that social policies need to be geared to providing support and security for these types of families. It is little cause for optimism however, that in recent years governments of all persuasions have shown an increasing reluctance to fund social welfare programs of this kind.
It is difficult to offer a comprehensive explanation for the growing trend of marital breakdown; and it is even more difficult to find solutions that might ameliorate the problems created by it. Clearly though, as I have argued in this essay, the most useful answers are to be found not within a narrow legal framework, but within a broader socio-economic one.
Finally, it is worth pointing out that, whilst we may appear to be living in a time of increased family instability, research suggests that historically, instability may have been the norm rather than the exception. As Bell and Zajdow (1997) point out, in the past, single parent and step families were more common than is assumed - although the disruptive influence then was not divorce, but the premature death of one or both parents. This situation suggests that in studying the modern family, one needs to employ a historical perspective, including the possibility of looking to the past in searching for ways of dealing with problems in the present.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1996). Divorces, Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
Bell, R. and G. Zajdow (1997) Family and household. In R. Jureidini, S. Kenny and M. Poole (eds). Sociology: Australian Connections. St Leonards. NSW: Allen and Unwin
Bilton, T., K. Bonnett and P. Jones (1987). Introductory Sociology, 2nd edition. London: MacMillan.
Haralambos, M. (1995). Sociology: Themes and Perspectives, 3rd edition. London: Bell and Hyman.
Harrison, M. (1995). Grounds for divorce. Family Matters. No 42 pp 34-35.
Johnson, V. (1981). The Last Resort: A Women's Refuge. Ringwood: Penguin.
Kilmartin, C. (1997). Children divorce and one-parent families. Family Matters. No. 48. ( Available On-line Opens in a new window)
McDonald, P. (1993). Family Trends and Structure in Australia. Australian Family Briefings No 3. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Recommended essay writing service
An important issue for sociologists, and indeed for all of society, is why these changes in marital patterns have occurred. In this essay I will seek to critically examine a number of sociological explanations for the 'divorce phenomenon' and also consider the social policy implications that each explanation carries with it. It will be argued that the best explanations are to be found within a broad socio-economic framework.
One type of explanation for rising divorce has focused on changes in laws relating to marriage. For example, Bilton, Bonnett and Jones (1987) argue that increased rates of divorce do not necessarily indicate that families are now more unstable. It is possible, they claim, that there has always been a degree of marital instability. They suggest that changes in the law have been significant, because they have provided unhappily married couples with 'access to a legal solution to pre-existent marital problems' (p.301). Bilton et al. therefore believe that changes in divorce rates can be best explained in terms of changes in the legal system. The problem with this type of explanation however, is that it does not consider why these laws have changed in the first place. It could be argued that reforms to family law, as well as the increased rate of divorce that has accompanied them, are the product of more fundamental changes in society.
Another type of explanation is one that focuses precisely on these broad societal changes. For example, Nicky Hart (cited in Haralambos, 1995) argues that increases in divorce and marital breakdown are the result of economic changes that have affected the family. One example of these changes is the raised material aspirations of families, which Hart suggests has put pressure on both spouses to become wage earners. Women as a result have been forced to become both homemakers and economic providers. According to Hart, the contradiction of these two roles has lead to conflict and this is the main cause of marital breakdown. It would appear that Hart's explanation cannot account for all cases of divorce - for example, marital breakdown is liable to occur in families where only the husband is working. Nevertheless, her approach, which is to relate changes in family relations to broader social forces, would seem to be more probing than one that looks only at legislative change.
The two explanations described above have very different implications for social policy, especially in relation to how the problem of increasing marital instability might be dealt with. Bilton et al. (1995) offer a legal explanation and hence would see the solutions also being determined in this domain. If rises in divorce are thought to be the consequence of liberal divorce laws, the obvious way to stem this rise is to make them less obtainable. This approach, one imagines, would lead to a reduction in divorce statistics; however, it cannot really be held up as a genuine solution to the problems of marital stress and breakdown in society. Indeed it would seem to be a solution directed more at symptoms than addressing fundamental causes. Furthermore, the experience of social workers, working in the area of family welfare suggests that restricting a couple's access to divorce would in some cases serve only to exacerbate existing marital problems (Johnson, 1981). In those cases where violence is involved, the consequences could be tragic. Apart from all this, returning to more restrictive divorce laws seems to be a solution little favoured by Australians. (Harrison, 1990).
Hart (cited in Haralambos, 1995), writing from a Marxist-feminist position, traces marital conflict to changes in the capitalist economic system and their resultant effect on the roles of men and women. It is difficult to know however, how such an analysis might be translated into practical social policies. This is because the Hart program would appear to require in the first place a radical restructuring of the economic system. Whilst this may be desirable for some, it is not achievable in the present political climate. Hart is right however, to suggest that much marital conflict can be linked in some way to the economic circumstances of families. This is borne out in many statistical surveys which show consistently that rates of divorce are higher among socially disadvantaged families (McDonald, 1993). This situation suggests then that social policies need to be geared to providing support and security for these types of families. It is little cause for optimism however, that in recent years governments of all persuasions have shown an increasing reluctance to fund social welfare programs of this kind.
It is difficult to offer a comprehensive explanation for the growing trend of marital breakdown; and it is even more difficult to find solutions that might ameliorate the problems created by it. Clearly though, as I have argued in this essay, the most useful answers are to be found not within a narrow legal framework, but within a broader socio-economic one.
Finally, it is worth pointing out that, whilst we may appear to be living in a time of increased family instability, research suggests that historically, instability may have been the norm rather than the exception. As Bell and Zajdow (1997) point out, in the past, single parent and step families were more common than is assumed - although the disruptive influence then was not divorce, but the premature death of one or both parents. This situation suggests that in studying the modern family, one needs to employ a historical perspective, including the possibility of looking to the past in searching for ways of dealing with problems in the present.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1996). Divorces, Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
Bell, R. and G. Zajdow (1997) Family and household. In R. Jureidini, S. Kenny and M. Poole (eds). Sociology: Australian Connections. St Leonards. NSW: Allen and Unwin
Bilton, T., K. Bonnett and P. Jones (1987). Introductory Sociology, 2nd edition. London: MacMillan.
Haralambos, M. (1995). Sociology: Themes and Perspectives, 3rd edition. London: Bell and Hyman.
Harrison, M. (1995). Grounds for divorce. Family Matters. No 42 pp 34-35.
Johnson, V. (1981). The Last Resort: A Women's Refuge. Ringwood: Penguin.
Kilmartin, C. (1997). Children divorce and one-parent families. Family Matters. No. 48. ( Available On-line Opens in a new window)
McDonald, P. (1993). Family Trends and Structure in Australia. Australian Family Briefings No 3. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Dissertation
Your dissertation must have all of these steps in order to be quality material !
Dissertation proposals & writing dissertations
Step 1: Dissertation proposals
Title
Introduction
Aims and objectives
Methodology
Literature review
Scope and constraints
Resources
Timetable
Outline of sections/chapters
References
Step 2: What sections go into a dissertation?
Cover page
Title page
Acknowledgements
Abstract
Contents page
List of figures or illustrations
Main body - introduction
Main body - literature survey
Main body - methodology
Main body - results
Main body - discussion
Main body - recommendations
Main body - conclusion
Reference List/Bibliography
Appendices
What a dissertation should look like
Title page
Numbering sections and figures
Page numbers
Format
Presentation
Binding
Submitting your dissertation
Dissertation proposals & dissertation checklist
Avoiding plagiarism
More help
Extra resources
Downloadables
Step 1: Dissertation proposals
Title
Introduction
Aims and objectives
Methodology
Literature review
Scope and constraints
Resources
Timetable
Outline of sections/chapters
References
Step 2: What sections go into a dissertation?
Cover page
Title page
Acknowledgements
Abstract
Contents page
List of figures or illustrations
Main body - introduction
Main body - literature survey
Main body - methodology
Main body - results
Main body - discussion
Main body - recommendations
Main body - conclusion
Reference List/Bibliography
Appendices
What a dissertation should look like
Title page
Numbering sections and figures
Page numbers
Format
Presentation
Binding
Submitting your dissertation
Dissertation proposals & dissertation checklist
Avoiding plagiarism
More help
Extra resources
Downloadables
Thursday, 1 January 2015
Education Thesis.. needed? Expert thesis writing service
| Title A Qualitative Study: Preparing First-Year College Students for the Residential Living Transition Creator Chrysa S. Hernandez Supervising Professor Dr. Suzanne S. Warell ERIC Subject Terms Student Affairs Services Communications Roommates Relationship Freshmen Residential Colleges Dormitories Abstract Student Affairs professionals see many students struggle with the adjustment of on-campus residential living. One of the most significant struggles in which students encounter is difficulty with roommate communication. The purpose of this qualitative study was to find ways to best prepare first-year college students for the transition to campus residential living. This study revealed potential issues that should be addressed, by first-year on-campus residential students sharing a room and wishing to openly communicate with roommates. Two online surveys were sent to 517 first-year college students, over the age of 18, at a small private liberal arts university in the Midwest. Fifty-four (n=54) participants completed the initial survey with five agreeing to participate in a focus group and three in individual interviews. Triangulation of data showed that the majority of participants preferred meeting with roommates prior to living together. Students suggested that they preferred to attend workshops and/or roommate social gatherings when arriving on-campus rather than receiving written materials that prepare them for residential living prior to coming to college. Findings from this study suggested that male first-year college students were less concerned with residential living preparation while their female counterparts preferred to have a more comprehensive preparation for on-campus residential living. Based on final data analysis, a set of comprehensive Residential Living Guidelines was created to assist first-year college students with this transition which include guidelines for open and honest lines of communication. Finally a list of recommendations for Student Affairs professionals was created to aid first-year students through this transition. Created 2014-12 | |||
| Recommended Thesis Writing Service | |||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)